PUB has done it. Apple has done it.
In recent events, both had came out strongly to say they were not at fault, only to have reports and actions proving otherwise later. Is this what they teach top management?
[PUB / Ministers]
1. (Defensive) Jun 18. Blocked drain was the cause: http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20100618-222731.html
2. (Retraction) Jul 19. Capacity is wanting: http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_555341.html
[Apple]
1. (Diversion) Jun 25. Don't hold it that way: http://newslite.tv/2010/06/25/apple-iphone-4-dont-hold-it-li.html
2. (Diversion) Jul 2. Apple claims that reception problem is due to error in calculation: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/02appleletter.html
3. (Diversion) Jul 21. Competitor phones have antenna problems too: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/apple-reframes-touch-of-death-as-gorilla-grip-of-death/9004
4. (Retraction) Aug 2. Apple drops competitor antenna criticism: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/gadgetreviews/apple-drops-competitor-antenna-criticism-from-website/16857
No comments:
Post a Comment