Saturday, June 13, 2009

Slamming for social irresponsibility. Who is right or wrong?

  1. University management who said the virus was restricted to the Queens? (an area in New York, about 1/4 of the total area)
  2. Suspected case who traveled on public trains to the clinic?
  3. Aircrew who went on holidays in infected areas while on stop-overs?
  4. Families who went holidaying in infected areas, despite travel advice?
It's hard to say.
Case #1, we didn't know much then.  However, what kind of naive fools in the management believed that the spread of the virus could not cross street boundaries?
Case #2, how was he to travel then?  He was told to go to the clinic.
Case #3, stay in the hotel?

But...
Case #4?..

2 comments:

  1. Endurance4:26 pm

    The question is, why is the flu being hyped up so much when they are not even bothering to quarantine those from high risk zones? is it that serious? is the disease that deadly? so far its not been proven.

    so why the fearmongering? why all this counting? will it mean anything when the number reaches 32448 infected? face it the unsaid stance in the rest of the world is "seasonal flu". get it and be done with it. the newspapers refuse to publish the fact that ur common cold kills more people everyday than this strain.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yay, papers like to hype up fears, for the sake of hyping. Kinda like troublemakers...

    ReplyDelete